Treatment results in patients with Stage IIA and IIB seminoma of testis

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

А. В. Сакало

Abstract

We analyzed results of chemotherapy (ChT) (3 РЕ, 4 РЕ, 3 РЕВ) in 47 patients with seminoma of testis Stages ІІА and ІІВ. As predictors of progression we evaluated the following parameters: age of patients, size of the primary tumor, preoperative level of hHG and LDG, cate gory pT of primary tumor, invasion of rete testis and lymphovascular invasion, size of the retroperitoneal metastases prior to ChT and per sistence of residual tumor after initial ChT. Univariate analysis yielded the unfavorable factors of progression in patients with Stage IIA and IIB seminoma of testis such as: size of retroperitoneal metastases, LDG level prior to orchidectomy, size of primary tumor and residual tumor after induction ChT. Based on mul tivariate analysis only size of retroperitoneal metastases prior to ChT (р= 0.044) has a impact on progression. The chemotherapy in patients with State IIA and IIB has moderate acute toxicity with 97.9% 5 years overall survival. Chemotherapy is an alternative to radiotherapy in this group of patients and can be con sidered a first line treatment. Based on Kaplan Meier analysis (log rank, Wilcoxon, Tarone Ware criteria) we postulate that patients with pT4 with shortest interval to relapse compared to pT1 pT3. Risk of progression in Stage IIB is high er compared to Stage IIA; elevated LDG is a feature of more probable for progression, and with residual tumor after ChT the progression happen ealier. As per Wald and Hosmer Lemeshov statistics, we found that three univariate models of progression three are prognostically valid, name ly, the size of retroperitoneal metastases, level of LDG and presence of residual tumor after ChT.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Сакало, А. В. (2015). Treatment results in patients with Stage IIA and IIB seminoma of testis. Health of Man, (4(55), 78–81. https://doi.org/10.30841/2307-5090.4(55).2015.104704
Section
Sexology and andrology
Author Biography

А. В. Сакало, ГУ «Институт урологии НАМН Украины»

A.V. Sakalo

References

Classen J. Radiotherapy for stages IIA/B testicular seminoma: Final report of a prospective multicenter clinical trial / J. Classen, H. Schmidberger, C. Meisner, [et al.] // J. Clin. Oncol. – 2003. – V. 21. – P. 1101–1106.

Chung PW. Stage II testicular seminoma: Patterns of recurrence and outcome of treatment / PW. Chung, MK. Gospodarowicz [et al] // Eur. Urol. – 2004. – V. 45. – P. 754–759.

Gholam D. Advanced seminoma: Treatment results and prognostic factors for survival after first line, cisplatin based chemotherapy and for patients with recurrent disease: A single institution experience in 145 patients / D. Gholam, K. Fizazi, MJ. Terrier Lacombe [et al.] // Cancer. – 2003. – V. 98. – P. 745–752.

Arranz Arija JA. E400P in advanced seminoma of good prognosis according to the international germ cell cancer collaborative group (IGCCCG) classification: The Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group experience / JA. Arranz Arija, X. Garcia del Muro, J. Guma [et al] // Ann. Oncol. – 2001. – V. 12. – P. 487–491.

Zagars GK. Mortality after cure of testicular seminoma / GK. Zagars, MT. Ballo, AK. Lee [et al] // J. Clin. Oncol. – 2004. – V. 22. – P. 640–647.

Incrocci L. Treatment outcome, body image, and sexual functioning after orchiectomy and radiotherapy for stage I II testicular seminoma / L. Incrocci, WC. Hop, A. Wijnmaalen [et al.] // Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002. – V. 53. – P. 1165–1173.

Krege S. Single agent carboplatin for CS IIA/B testicular seminoma: A phase II study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG) / S. Krege, C. Boergermann, R. Baschek [et al.] // Ann Oncol. – 2006. – V. 17. – P. 276–280.

Bokemeyer C. Metastatic seminoma treated with either single agent carboplatin or cisplatin based combination chemotherapy: A pooled analysis of two randomised trials / C. Bokemeyer, C. Kollmannsberger [et al] // Br J Cancer. – 2004. – V. 91. – P. 683–687.

Culine S. Refining the optimal chemotherapy regimen for good risk metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: A randomized trial of the Genito Urinary Group of the French Federation of Cancer Centers (GETUG T93BP) / S. Culine, P. Kerbrat, A. Kramar [et al.] // Ann Oncol. – 2007. – V.18. – P. 917–924.

Kondagunta GV. Etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic good risk germ cell tumors / GV. Kondagunta, J. Bacik [et al.] // J Clin Oncol. – 2005. – V. 23. – P. 9290–9294.

Richiardi L. Second malignancies among survivors of germ cell testicular cancer: A pooled analysis between 13 cancer registries / L. Richiardi, G. Scelo, P. Boffetta [et al.] // Int J Cancer. – 2007. – V. 120. – P. 623–631.

Travis LB. Second cancers among 40,576 testicular cancer patients: Focus on long term survivors / LB. Travis, SD. Fossa [et al.] // J Natl Cancer Inst. – 2005. – V. 97. – P. 1354–1365.

van den Belt Dusebout AW. Treatment specific risks of second malig nancies and cardiovascular disease in 5 year survivors of testicular cancer / AW. van den Belt Dusebout, R. de Wit, JA.Gietema [et al.] // J Clin Oncol. - 2007. – V. 25. – P. 4370–4378.

Travis LB. Treatment associated leukemia following testicular cancer / LB. Travis, M. Andersson, M. Gospodarowicz [et al.] // J Natl Cancer Inst. – 2000. – V. 92. – P. 1165–1171.

Robinson D. Mortality and incidence of second cancers following treatment for testicular cancer / D. Robinson, H. Moller, A. Horwich // Br J Cancer. – 2007. – V. 96. – P. 529–533.

Schairer C. Comparative mortality for 621 second cancers in 29356 testicular cancer survivors and 12420 matched first cancers / C. Schairer, M. Hisada, BE. Chen [et al.] // J Natl Cancer Inst. – 2007. – V. 99. – P. 1248–1256.

Huyghe E. Fertility after testicular cancer treatments: Results of a large multi center study / E. Huyghe, T. Matsuda, M. Daudin [et al.] // Cancer. – 2004. – V. 100. – P. 732–737.

van den Belt Dusebou AW, Long term risk of cardiovascular disease in 5 year survivors of testicular cancer / AW. van den Belt Dusebout, J. Nuver, R. de Wit [et al.] // J Clin Oncol. – 2006. – V. 24. – P. 467–475.