Penile implants: from the history of the issue to the integration into the routine andrology

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF (Русский)
Published: Dec 21, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30841/2307-5090.4(55).2015.104491
Keywords:
penile implants, endofalloprotezuvannya, surgical correction,

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

І. І. Горпинченко
ГУ «Институт урологии НАМН Украины», Ukraine
О. М. Корнієнко
ГУ «Институт урологии НАМН Украины», Ukraine
М. Г. Романюк
ГУ «Институт урологии НАМН Украины», Ukraine
М. О. Щербак
ГУ «Институт урологии НАМН Украины», Ukraine

Abstract

The paper studied the history of penile implants, data from our own experience of implantations at the department of andrology and sexology of SI «Institute of Urology of NAMS of Ukraine.» The dissatisfactionon in 14.7% of patients after insertion of penile implant is usually correlated with psychological component and leads to the necessity of correction with psychotherapeutic methods. In 12.7% of cases the cause of complications are mechanical damage of the implants, which requires a mandatory surgical correction with full restoration of functional ability of penile implant.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Горпинченко, І. І., Корнієнко, О. М., Романюк, М. Г., & Щербак, М. О. (2015). Penile implants: from the history of the issue to the integration into the routine andrology. Health of Man, (4(55), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.30841/2307-5090.4(55).2015.104491
Issue
No. 4(55) (2015)
Section
Topical issues
Copyright (c) 2020 І. І. Горпинченко, О. М. Корнієнко, М. Г. Романюк, М. О. Щербак

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the first publication of original scientific articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to distribute work with acknowledgment of authorship and first publication in this journal.

Author Biographies

І. І. Горпинченко, ГУ «Институт урологии НАМН Украины»

I.I. Gorpynchenko

О. М. Корнієнко, ГУ «Институт урологии НАМН Украины»

O.M. Kornyenko

М. Г. Романюк, ГУ «Институт урологии НАМН Украины»

M.G. Romaniuk

М. О. Щербак, ГУ «Институт урологии НАМН Украины»

M.O. Scherbak

References

Hakky TS, Wang R, Henry GD. The evo lution of the inflatable penile prosthetic device and surgical innovations with anatomical considerations. Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15:410.

Schultheiss D, Gabouev AI, Jonas U. Nikolaj A. Bogoraz (1874–1952): pioneer of phalloplasty and penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2005;2:139–146.

Gee WF. A history of surgical treatment of impotence. Urology. 1975;05:401–405.

Горпинченко И.И., Мирошников Л.O. Эректильная дисфункция. – Львов, 2003. – С. 6–85.

Carson CC. Penile prostheses: state of the art. In: Kirby RS, O’Leary MP, edi tors. Recent advances in urology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. pp. 61–72.

Goldstein I, Lue TF, Padma Nathan H, Rosen RC, Steers WD, Wicker PA. Sildenafil Study Group. Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1397–1404.

Wilson SK, Delk JR., 2nd Historical advances in penile prostheses. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12(Suppl 4):S101–S107.

Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology. 1973;2:80–82.

Small MP, Carrion HM, Gordon JA. Small Carrion penile prosthesis. New implant for management of impotence. Urology. 1975;5:479–486.

Jonas U., Jacobi G.H. Silicone silver penile prosthesis: description, operative approach and results. J Urol 1980; 123(6): 865–7.

Dorflinger T., Bruskewitz R. AMS mal leable penile prosthesis. Urology 1986; 28(6): 480–5.

Moul J.W., McLeod D.G. Experience with the AMS 600 malleable penile prosthe sis. J Urol 1986;135(5):929–31.

Salama N. Satisfaction with the mal leable penile prosthesis among couples from the Middle East – is it different from that reported elsewhere? Int J Impot Res 2004;16(2):175–80.

Goldstein I., Bertero E.B., Kaufman J.M. et al. Early experience with the first precon nected 3 piece inflatable penile prosthesis: the Mentor Alpha 1. J Urol 1993; 150(6): 1814–8.

Garber B.B. Mentor Alpha 1 inflatable penile prosthesis: patient satisfaction and device reliability. Urology 1994; 43(2): 214–7.

Kearse W.S.Jr., Sago A.L., Peretsman S.J. et al. Report of a multicen ter clinical evaluation of the Dura II penile prosthesis. J Urol 1996;155(5):1613–6.

Fathy A., Shamloul R., Abdel Rahim A. et al. Experience with tube (Promedon) malleable penile implant. Urol Int 2007; 79(3): 244–7.

Scarzella G.L. Transverse scrotal approach for insertion of AMS inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1990;35(4):373.

Wilson S.K. Reimplantation of inflatable penile prosthesis into scarred corporeal bod ies. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15 (Suppl 5): S125–8.

Wilson S.K., Cleves M.A., Delk J.R. 2nd. Long term follow up of treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 2001;165(3):825–9.

Brusky J.P., Tran V.Q., Rieder J.M., Aboseif S.R. A preliminary report on com bined penoscrotal and perineal approach for placement of penile prosthesis with corporal fibrosis. Adv Urol 2008: 524392. doi: 10.1155/2008/524392.

Sadeghi Nejad H., Ilbeigi P., Wilson S.K. et al. Multi institutional outcome study on the efficacy of closed suction drainage of the scrotum in three piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res 2005;17(6):535–8.