Modern Algorithm for Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases in Men That Lead to Infertility

Authors

  • Oleh Nikitin Bogomolets National Medical University
  • Mykola Yasynetsky Bogomolets National Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30841/2307-5090.4.2020.225566

Keywords:

infertility, application of reproductive technologies, treatment, men

Abstract

The problem of sterile marriage provides great importance throughout the world. Infertility is a condition that is accompanied by a number of diseases of the genital organs and systemic diseases of the male or female organism. According to various literary sources, about 50–100 million people suffer from infertility in the world, that is, one out of 5–7 couples of reproductive age suffers from infertility.

The problem of infertility in marriage is of particular importance in the context of the demographic crisis in Ukraine, where the frequency of infertile marriage among married couples of reproductive age is 10,0–15,0 %, and in some regions this indicator is close to 20,0 %. In Ukraine, there are more than 1 million infertile married couples, the male factor in the structure of infertility is about 40-50 % of cases. Most authors point to the polyetiology of male infertility. In its development, a significant role is assigned to such factors as neuropsychic, infectious toxic, congenital and genetic reasons, exogenous and habitual intoxications, ionizing radiation, dysfunctions of the endocrine glands and other internal organs, exposure to temperatures, vascular disorders, damage to the genital organs and their autoimmune lesions.

Infertility is a complex and multifaceted problem, and there are a lot of different questions which need to solve. Particular difficulties arise in determining the treatment tactics in cases where there is a combination of various causes of infertility in a married couple. Opportune examination of partners with using modern hardware, laboratory and genetic methods is very important, and it allows to prescribe an effective treatment.

The use of reproductive technologies significantly expands the possibilities for solving the problem of infertility. However, their main purpose is the birth of a child; treatment of diseases that have led to infertility requires additional efforts.

In this regard, the development of modern methods of diagnosis and treatment of sterile marriage remains one of the actual problems.

Author Biographies

Oleh Nikitin, Bogomolets National Medical University

Oleh D. Nikitin,

Department of Urology

Mykola Yasynetsky, Bogomolets National Medical University

Mykola O. Yasynetsky,

Department of Urology

References

Горпинченко И.И., Никитин О.Д. Бесплодный брак в Украине. Новые реальности / И.И. Горпинченко // Здоровье мужчины. – 2010. – № 3. – С. 184–190.

WHO Manual for the Standardized Investigation and Diagnosis of the Infertile Couple. 2000, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 5th ed. 2010.

Kim, G.Y. What should be done for men with sperm DNA fragmentation? Clin Exp Reprod Med, 2018. 45: 101.

Evenson, D.P. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA(R)). Methods Mol Biol, 2013. 927: 147.

Nicopoullos, J., et al. Novel use of COMET parameters of sperm DNA damage may increase its utility to diagnose male infertility and predict live births following both IVF and ICSI. Hum Reprod, 2019.

The clinical utility of sperm DNA integrity testing: a guideline. Fertil Steril, 2013. 99: 673.

Johnson, M.D. Genetic risks of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of male infertility: recommendations for genetic counseling and screening. Fertil Steril, 1998. 70: 397.

Clementini, E., et al. Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in 2078 infertile couples referred for assisted reproductive techniques. Hum Reprod, 2005. 20: 437.

Vincent, M.C., et al. Cytogenetic investigations of infertile men with low sperm counts: a 25-year experience. J Androl, 2002. 23: 18.

Deebel, N.A., et al. Age-related presence of spermatogonia in patients with Klinefelter syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update, 2020. 26: 58.

Vockel, M., et al. The X chromosome and male infertility. Hum Genet, 2019.

Agarwal, A., et al. Sperm DNA damage assessment: a test whose time has come. Fertil Steril, 2005. 84: 850.

Bisht, S., et al. Oxidative stress and male infertility. Nat Rev Urol, 2017. 14: 470.

Agarwal, A., et al. Oxidation-reduction potential as a new marker for oxidative stress: Correlation to male infertility. Investig Clin Urol, 2017. 58: 385.

Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 2014. 102: 1556.

Freeman, S., et al. Ultrasound evaluation of varicoceles: guidelines and recommendations of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group (ESURSPIWG) for detection, classification, and grading. Eur Radiol, 2019

WHO Manual for the Standardized Investigation, Diagnosis and Management of the Infertile Male. 2000, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Purvis, K., et al. Infection in the male reproductive tract. Impact, diagnosis and treatment in relation to male infertility. Int J Androl, 1993. 16: 1.

Weidner, W., et al. Relevance of male accessory gland infection for subsequent fertility with special focus on prostatitis. Hum Reprod Update, 1999. 5: 421.

Gimenes, F., et al. Male infertility: a public health issue caused by sexually transmitted pathogens. Nat Rev Urol, 2014. 11: 672.

Fode, M., et al. Sexually Transmitted Disease and Male Infertility: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus, 2016. 2: 383.

Rusz, A., et al. Influence of urogenital infections and inflammation on semen quality and male fertility. World J Urol, 2012. 30: 23.

Huang, C., et al. Mycoplasma and ureaplasma infection and male infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology, 2015. 3: 809.

Condorelli, R.A., et al. Chronic prostatitis and its detrimental impact on sperm parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endocrinol Invest, 2017.

Boeri, L., et al. High-risk human papillomavirus in semen is associated with poor sperm progressive motility and a high sperm DNA fragmentation index in infertile men. Hum Reprod, 2019. 34: 209.

Foresta, C., et al. HPV-DNA sperm infection and infertility: From a systematic literature review to a possible clinical management proposal. Andrology, 2015. 3: 163.

Lyu, Z., et al. Human papillomavirus in semen and the risk for male infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis, 2017. 17: 714.

Xiong, Y.Q., et al. The risk of human papillomavirus infection for male fertility abnormality: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl, 2018. 20: 493.

Depuydt, C.E., et al. Infectious human papillomavirus virions in semen reduce clinical pregnancy rates in women undergoing intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril, 2019. 111: 1135.

A. Jungwirth, et al. Guidelines for investigation and treatment male infertility. European urology 2012, Jan;61(1): 159–63.

Published

2021-03-15

Issue

Section

Distance learning